Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Sport Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 phD Sport Management, Faculty of Sports Management, University of gilan.

3 M.Sc Sport Management, Faculty of Sports Management, University of tehran

4 Assistant Professor of Biomechanics, Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: Functional Movement Screening Test (FMS) is a tool that has the ability to determine a person's potential for the possibility of suffering from musculoskeletal abnormalities and sports injuries. FMS tests include seven functional movement tests that evaluate trunk, central strength and stability, neuromuscular coordination, asymmetry in movement, and flexibility. The purpose of this research was to determine the norm of the functional motor screening test in the male handball players of the Sepahan club in Isfahan.
Method: The method of collecting information is cross-sectional and in terms of practical purpose. For this purpose, 30 male students aged 14-16 from Sepahan Handball Club of Isfahan were evaluated by performing 7 FMS tests.
Findings: The norm of FMS test in 14-year-old students was 14.39±1.66, in 15-year-old students it was 15.85±1.47, and in 16-year-old students it was 15.29±1.21. Therefore, it can be stated that the FMS scores in these people are in a better condition compared to related studies in this age group. Also, the test scores separately showed that 75% of this population does not have enough stability in the central part of the body.
Discussion and conclusion: In many sports activities, the movements of the upper and lower limbs need to have sufficient stability in the central area, if there is no stability in this area, energy transfer does not take place well. Since this age group is at the beginning of official sports competitions and considering that the clinical usefulness of FMS is limited by the lack of Norm index in Iran, sports medicine specialists and sports team coaches can evaluate the value of Norm scores to diagnose and identify people. at the risk of physical deformity and injury at different ages and plan bodybuilding and corrective exercises based on it

Keywords

Abraham A, Sannasi R. Normative values for the FMSTM in adolescent school aged children. J Sports Phys Ther. 2015; Res 10(1): 29-36.
 
Agresta C, Slobodinsky M, Tucker C. Functional movement ScreenTM-normative values in healthy distance runners. Int J Sports Med, 2014. 35(14): p. 1203-745(3):725-732.
 
Armstrong R. Functional movement screening as a predictor of injury in male and female university rugby union players. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2016; 102(1): 178-179.
 
Bardenett SM. The Functional Movement Screen normative values and validity in high school Athletes: CAN THE FMS BE USED AS A PREDICTOR OF INJURY? Int J Sports Phys Ther: (3)10. 2015, p. 303-8.
 
Bonazza NA, Smuin D, Onks CA, Silvis ML, Dhawan A. Meta-analysis. The American journal of Sports Medicine. 2017; 725-732
 
Bushman TT, Grier TL, Canham-Chervak M, Anderson MK, North WJ, Jones BH. The functional movement screen and injury risk: Association and predictive value in active men. The American journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;44(2):297-304.
 
Chorba RS, Chorba DJ, Bouillon LE, Overmyer CA, Landis JA. Use of a Functional Movement Screening Tool to Determine Injury Risk in Female
Collegiate Athletes. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2010; 5(2):47-54.
 
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function–part 1. North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2006;1(2):62-72.
 
Cook, G. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function- part 1. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2014. 9(3): p. 396-409.
 
Domhnaill F, O'Malley E, Blake C. Normative data for the Functional Movement Screen in male Gaelic field sports. Manual therapy, 2014. 15: p. 194-199.
 
Everard EM, Harrison AJ, Lyons M. Examining the Relationship Between the Functional Movement Screen and the Landing Error Scoring System in an Active, Male Collegiate Population. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017;31(5):1265-1272.
 
Maffulli N. The growing child in sport. Br Med Bull. 1992;48:561-568.
 
Mills JD, Taunton JE, Mills WA. The effect of a 10-week training regimen on lumbopelvic stability and athletic performance in female athletes: a randomized-controlled trial. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2005;6(2):60-66.
 
Newton F, McCall A, Ryan D, Blackburne C, aus der Fünten K, Meyer T, et al. Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) score does not predict injury in English Premier League youth academy football players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Football. 2017;1(2): 102-106.
 
Okada T, Huxel KC, Nesser TW.Relationship between core stability,functional movement, and performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2011;25(1):252-61.
 
Parchmann CJ, McBride JM. Relationship between functional movement screen and athletic performance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 2011;25(12):3378-84.
 
Perry FT and Koehle MS. Normative data for the functional movement screen in middle-aged adults J Strength Cond. 2013; Res 27(2): 458-462.
 
Powell, JW, Barber-Foss, MS. (1999). Injury patterns in selected high school sports: A review of the 1995- 1997 seasons. JAT. 1999;34(3):277-284.
 
Schneiders G, Davidsson A, Horman E, Sullivan J S. Functional Movement Screen Normative values in a young active population, International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 2011;6:75-82.
 
Shojaedin SS, Hadadnezhad M. Relationship between functional movement screening score and history of injury and identifying the predictive value of the FMS for injury. JRRS. 2013;9(3):459-69.